logo

Pakistan Under-19 Cricket Team Mistaken for Asylum Seekers in Portsmouth

For Pakistan’s Under-19 cricketers, this tour was supposed to be about English pitches, early autumn light, and the rhythm of long days in the field. Instead, one evening in Portsmouth, they found themselves framed as the villains in someone else’s argument.

Outside the Marriott Hotel where the squad was staying, around 30 to 40 protesters gathered on Tuesday after rumours online claimed that a coachload of asylum seekers had arrived. Banners and anger turned up before the facts did.

Police were called shortly before 6.30pm. Officers moved in, spoke to those outside, and quickly discovered the supposed “foreign nationals” were, in fact, Pakistan’s Under-19 cricket team on tour.

The players, teenagers on the cusp of their professional dreams, had become the target of a protest that had nothing to do with them.

A Photo, a Rumour, and a Crowd

The chain reaction started with a single image. A photograph of people stepping off a coach appeared online. No context. No confirmation. Just faces and assumptions.

From there, the narrative took off on its own. A group of “foreign nationals” was enough to spark claims that asylum seekers were being housed at the hotel. Within hours, a protest had formed.

Reform councillor George Madgwick decided to check before joining the outrage. He rang the hotel, spoke directly with the Pakistan team’s coach, and realised the story circulating online had collapsed under the weight of a simple phone call.

“I spoke to the coach of the team, who was very understanding,” Madgwick told the Guardian. He then walked out to the protesters and told them they had the wrong people. “I went out to the protesters and told them, ‘You’ve got it wrong guys, it’s a cricket club.’ They left within a couple of minutes. It was a massively unfortunate incident.”

The anger drained away almost as quickly as it had formed. But the damage to Portsmouth’s image lingered.

Madgwick later explained how flimsy the foundations of the protest had been. “Someone online saw a group of what looked like foreign nationals leaving the coach and put a photo of it online and that's where it spurred from,” he told the BBC. “It was mere speculation rather than based on truth or fact.”

Police, Politics and a City’s Reflection

Hampshire Constabulary confirmed that officers spoke to those gathered and clarified the situation. No offences were identified. The crowd dispersed shortly before 9pm, the evening ending not with arrests, but with a sense of unease over how easily it had all escalated.

Portsmouth North MP Amanda Martin did not hold back in her assessment. She condemned the fact that a junior cricket team had been swept up in a protest built on misinformation.

“There is a legitimate debate to be had about immigration, but it must be based on facts not misinformation or rumour,” Martin said.

Her words cut to the heart of the episode: a group of teenagers, far from home, dragged into the crossfire of Britain’s immigration debate because of a miscaptioned photo and a rush to judgement.

Cricket Amid the Noise

Away from the hotel car park and the noise outside, Pakistan’s Under-19s have been quietly going about their original business: playing cricket.

While the senior Pakistan side locks horns with England in the Test arena, the Under-19s are running their own parallel campaign. They lost a tight four-day match against England Under-19 by just 10 runs in Arundel, a game that underlined how fine the margins are at this level. Then they hit back hard, crushing England Under-19 by 177 runs in a Youth ODI on 9 September.

The England and Wales Cricket Board has checked in on the squad’s wellbeing and is reviewing security for the remainder of the tour, mindful that these players should be thinking about line and length, not protests and police briefings.

For the boys in green, the message is simple: keep playing, keep touring, keep learning. For everyone watching from the outside, the question is sharper. When a junior cricket team can be mistaken for a political flashpoint on the strength of a single photo, what happens the next time the rumour mill starts to spin?